The Journal of the Egyptian Society of Engineers adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process to ensure the publication of high-quality, original, and impactful research. The peer review process is designed to uphold the journal's commitment to academic integrity, scientific rigor, and the advancement of knowledge across the various disciplines of engineering and technology.

Stages of the Peer Review Process

Initial Submission and Editorial Assessment

• Manuscripts are submitted through the journal's online submission system.
• The editorial office conducts a preliminary assessment to ensure compliance with the journal's scope, formatting guidelines, and ethical standards.
• Manuscripts that do not meet the basic requirements are returned to the authors for revision or rejected outright.

Assignment to Reviewers

• Submissions that pass the initial screening are assigned to at least two independent, expert reviewers.
• The selection of reviewers is based on their expertise in the manuscript's specific subject area.
• The journal employs a double-blind review process, where both the authors and reviewers remain anonymous to ensure unbiased evaluation.

Review Process

• Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on criteria such as originality, scientific quality, clarity, relevance to the journal's scope, and contribution to the field.
• Reviewers provide detailed feedback and recommendations, which may include acceptance, minor revisions, major revisions, or rejection.
• The review process typically takes 4–8 weeks, depending on the complexity of the manuscript and the availability of reviewers.

Editorial Decision

• The editor consolidates the reviewers' feedback and makes an informed decision on the manuscript.
• Possible decisions include:

Accept: The manuscript meets all quality standards and is ready for publication.

Minor Revisions: The manuscript requires small corrections before acceptance.

Major Revisions: Significant issues must be addressed, and the revised manuscript will undergo another round of review.

Reject: The manuscript does not meet the journal's quality or relevance standards.

Revision and Resubmission

• Authors are required to address all reviewer comments and provide a detailed response to each point raised.
• Revised manuscripts are resubmitted to the editorial office for further evaluation.
• In cases of major revisions, the manuscript may be sent back to the original reviewers for re-evaluation.

Final Decision and Proofing

• Once the manuscript is accepted, it undergoes final editing and proofreading to ensure accuracy and consistency.
• Authors receive galley proofs for review and approval before publication.

Publication

• Accepted manuscripts are published individually in an article-by-article model and compiled into an annual issue.
• The journal provides open-access publication, ensuring broad dissemination and accessibility of the research.

Ethical Standards and Reviewer Responsibilities

• Reviewers are expected to adhere to strict ethical guidelines, including maintaining confidentiality, avoiding conflicts of interest, and providing constructive, unbiased feedback.
• The journal follows international ethical standards for scientific publishing, including those outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

By implementing this comprehensive peer review process, the Journal of the Egyptian Society of Engineers ensures the publication of credible, impactful research that contributes to the advancement of engineering and technology.