المحفزات البصرية فى عملية التصميم ومردودها على المنتج المعمارى

Document Type : Scientific and technological

Author

بکالوريوس هندسة قسم عمارة جامعة الازهر

Abstract

ينتمي التصميم کنشاط إلى ما يُعرف بالمشکلات الشريرة(26). تم تعريف مشاکل الشر على أنها مشاکل تعاني من نقص فى المعلومات حول الحالة الأولية والهدف والروابط بينها (18) (29). أشارت العديد من الدراسات إلى الدور الإيجابى للمعلومات، وخاصة المرئية منها في عملية التصميم(8)(12). على الرغم من توافر الدراسات التجريبية على نطاق واسع في هذا الصدد، لم يتم فحص مدى تأثير هذه المحفزات على صياغة المنتج النهائي في عملية تصميم واقعية. تهدف هذه الورقة إلى دراسة تأثير المحفزات البصرية على عملية التصميم بمراجعة الأدبيات ذات الصلة، بالإضافة إلى فحص تأثيرها على الشکل النهائي لمنتج معماري، من خلال تحديد متحف غوغنهايم کدراسة حالة.

Keywords


1- Cai, H., Do, E. Y., & Zimring, C. M. (2010, March). Extended linkography and distance graph in design evaluation: an empirical study of the dual effects of inspiration sources in creative design. Design Studies (31) 2, pp. 146-168.
2- Chakrabarti , A. (2010). Motivation as a Major Direction for Design Creativity Research. In T. Taura , & Y. Nagai , Design Creativity (pp. 49 – 56). London : Springer press.
3- Ching, F. D. (2007). Architecture: Form, Space, and Order. John Wiley & Sons; 3rd edition.p: 346 & 347.
4- Christensen, B. T., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design. Memory & Cognition (35), 29–38.
5- Cila, N., Hekkert, P., & Visch, V. (2014). Source selection in product metaphor generation: The effects of salience and relatedness. International Journal of Design 8(1), 15 – 28.
6- Collins, M. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2019). Motivation and Creativity. In J. C. Kaufman , & R. J. Sternberg , The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 297 – 312). Cambridge University Press.
7- Curtis, W. j. (1996). Modern Architecture Since 1900. Phaidon Press; 3rd edition.
8- Eckert, C. M., & Stacey, M. (2000). Sources of Inspiration: A Language of Design. Design Studies 21(5), 523 – 538.
9- Eilouti, B. (2018, July). Systematic Concept Derivation and Translation in Engineering Design. Proceedings of The 22nd World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, pp. 188-193.
10- Gerstberger, P. G., & Allen, T. J. (1968). Criteria used by research and development engineers in the selection of an information source. Journal of Applied Psychology 52(4), 272–279.
11- Goldschmidt, G., & Sever, A. L. (2011). Inspiring design ideas with texts. Design Studies (32) 2, 139-155.
12- Goldschmid, G., & Smolkov, M. (2006). Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Design Studies (27)5, 549-569
13- Gonçalves, M. (2016, March 3). Decoding designers’ inspiration process. Portugal , Grant , Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT).
14- Jencks , C. (2015, Oct 24). Charles Jencks Iconic Building. Retrieved from vdocuments: https://vdocuments.mx/charles-jencks-iconic-building.html
15- Jencks, C. (2005). The Iconic Building. Rizzoli.
16- Kohlstedt , K. (2020). Lessons from Sin City: The Architecture of "Ducks" Versus "Decorated Sheds".
17- Laseau, P. (2000). Graphic Thinking for Architects and Designers. Wiley, 3th edition.
18- Lawson, B. (2004). What Designers Know. Architectural Press. P: 33 – 46.
19- Lawson, B. (2005). How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. Architectural Press
20- Malaga, R. A. (2000). The effect of stimulus modes and associative distance in individual creativity support
1- Assistant Professor of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Al-Azhar University
2- Professor of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Al-Azhar University
3- B.Sc. Of Architecture, Al- Azhar University
systems. Decis. Support Syst. Vol (29), 125 – 141.
21- Moore, R. (2017, Oct 1). The Bilbao effect: how Frank Gehry’s Guggenheim started a global craze. Retrieved from theguardian: https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2017/oct/01/bilbao-effect-frank-gehry-guggenheim-global-craze
22- Mougenot, C., Bouchard, C., Aoussat, A., & Westerman, S. (2008). Inspiration, images and design: an investigation of designers’ information gathering strategies. Journal of Design Research, Inderscience 7 (4), 331-351.
23- MILLS, C. B. (2011). Designing with Models: A Studio Guide to Architectural Process Models. United States of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 3rd ed. P: 3& 4& 6.
24- Plowright, P. D. (2014). Revealing Architectural Design : Methods, Frameworks and Tools. London: Routledge 1st Edition. P: 17, 110, 111, 112
25- Quintal, B., & Santibañez, D. (2017, April 1). The Creative Energy of Zaha's Sketches. Retrieved from archdaily: https://www.archdaily.com/868315/the-creative-energy-of-zahas-sketches?ad_medium=gallery
26- Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences (4), 155-169.
27- Römer, A., Pache, M., Weißhahn, G., & Lindemann, U. (2001). Effort-saving product representations in design – Results of a questionnaire survey. Design Studies 22(6), 473-491.
28- Sarkar, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (2008). The effect of representation of triggers on design outcomes. AI EDAM: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing (22)2, 101 – 116.
29- Schumacher, P. (2012). The Autopoiesis of Architecture, Volume II: A New Agenda for Architecture. Wiley. P: 298 & 329.
30- Toh , C. A., & Miller, S. R. (2014). The impact of example modality and physical interactions on design creativity. Journal of Mechanical Design (9) 136, 14 – 39.
31- Ware, C. (2008). Visual Thinking: for Design. Morgan Kaufmann.
32- Wilson, T. (1997). Information Behaviour: an Interdisciplinary Perspective. Information Processing & Management 33(4), 551-572.
33- Wong, W. (1991). Fundamentos del diseño bi- y tri-dimensional. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
34- حسن, ن. م. (2014). الإلهام المعمارى. الرياض، السعودية: دار جامعة الملک سعود للنشر. صـ 7 - 18